Start from a template or blank
In the Review tab, click the + to open the new-reviewer drawer. You can start from a template like Hemingway or Worldbuilding, or build entirely from scratch.
Creating a reviewer: start blank or from a template, then set its name, tier, instructions, and examples.
A worked example: a world-consistency checker
Say you’re writing fantasy and want to catch a magic rule or a piece of geography contradicting something from three chapters ago, not grammar. No built-in reviewer does that. Here’s how to build one that does.1
Start blank and name it
Something specific: World Consistency Checker, not just “Consistency.”
2
Pick the right tier
This is a structural concern, not a line-level one, so Developmental is the right tier: it judges the story, not the sentences.
3
Write a one-line description
This is what surfaces under the name in the panel:
Flags contradictions in magic rules and world lore.4
Write specific instructions
Vague instructions get vague comments. Be concrete about what to check and what NOT to do:
Check every mention of magic, geography, or timeline against the Story Atlas. Flag it, don't rewrite prose.
A filled-in reviewer: a specific name, the right tier, and instructions that name exactly what to check.
See it live in your panel
Once you save it, your reviewer appears in its tier alongside the built-in ones, and runs the same way: toggle it on, and it joins the next review you run.
The custom reviewer live in the panel, toggled on alongside another custom reviewer.
Iterate on your reviewer
The first version of a custom reviewer is rarely the last. After a review run, look at what it actually flagged:- Too noisy? Narrow the instructions. “Check every mention of magic” might need to become “check only magic system rules, not incidental references to spells.”
- Missing things? Add an example or two under Examples. A couple of good input-to-rewrite pairs teaches the reviewer your specific standard faster than more prose in the instructions.
- Wrong tier? Edit it and move it. A reviewer that’s really about voice belongs in Line, not Developmental, regardless of where you first put it.
Next: Exporting and Sharing
Get your manuscript out of Quarkle and in front of readers.

